Environmental impacts
Environmental impact calculation are activated in the Cairn “TecEcoAnalysis” component. Environmental impacts have to be defined for each component.
Environmental impact are defined in Cairn through the “TecEcoAnalysis” component in the parameters tab.
It is possible to consider several impacts (list based on EF V3.0, lca_parameters
).
Fig. 15 In the “Parameters Tab” in the “TecEcoAnalysis” component |
See also
lca_intro
lca_ef
For each component:
Indicators are calculated only for a component itself.
The environmental model (EnvironmentModel,
lca_parameters_compo
) has to be activated.The tabs (Env. Impacts and Ports) in which environmental impacts can be configured are colored green. It is possible to set for each impact :
Grey or manufacturing impact linked to the size (in tab “Environmental impacts” of a component) owing to coeffs A and B (see
lca_parameters_compo_grey
) : \(m = A * size + B\)In case of replacement modelling, grey impacts can be added using the “EnvGreyReplacement” (A coeff) and “EnvGreyReplacementConstant” (B coeff)parameters.
Direct or consumption impact linked to flux (can be selected by the user in tab “Ports”) owing to coeffs A and B (see
lca_parameters_compo_direct
): \(m = A * flux + B\).The A coefficient can be also set using a timeseries (“UseEnvContentTS_A”=True, the timeseries is given in the “EnvContentTS_A” field).
Hint
It is possible to take into account in the economic objective function by tax penalty if the impact cost of the “TecEcoAnalysis” component (green tab Env. Impacts) is given a non zero (see
lca_parameters_cost
where \(50\; €/kg\; CO2\) is set). In this case, the component “EcoInvestModel” has to be enabled (seelca_parameters_compo
).Fig. 18 Impose impact cost and constraints in the “TecEcoAnalysis” component
It is possible to take into account a levelized maximum constraint (see
lca_parameters_cost
where the flag “”MaxContraint is set at 1 with a levelized maximum value at \(10000\; kg\; CO2\))
Important
The user should be very careful not to mix models for the same carbon sources:
It is correct to define environmental impact for an energy (electrical) or material carrier (fluid, hydrogen, CH4). All converters connected to the carrier and the corresponding grid will be considered. Then, environmental impact due to the vector is accounted at the grid level. The use of this carrier on several converters is enseared without adding any other data and without knowing which converters is contributing the most.
It would be wrong to both define environmental impact on a carrier and on each converter. In this situation, Environmental impacts would then be accounted TWICE.